This chapter discusses the ‘received view’ of causation as a relation among events that is asymmetrical (effects follow causes), nonreflexive (no event can cause itself), transitive (if A causes B, and B causes C, A causes C), and backed by laws. The suggestion is that, although elements of the received view reflect aspects of the phenomenon of causation, it might be beneficial to consider the causal nexus, particular causings. Causings are manifestings of powers or dispositions. Causings are symmetrical and continuous, instances of interactions. Playing cards propped up against one another provide a more representative, less misleading model than do colliding billiard balls. Causing is fully deterministic. Indeterminacy can be introduced into the universe via spontaneous manifestations of certain properties (as in the decay of a radium atom). The causal efficacy of absences is discussed along with talk of preventers, antidotes, blockers, inhibitors, and finks.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.