Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Regulatory StateConstitutional Implications$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Dawn Oliver, Tony Prosser, and Richard Rawlings

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780199593170

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593170.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 28 May 2020

Regulatory Governance and the Challenge of Constitutionalism

Regulatory Governance and the Challenge of Constitutionalism

Chapter:
(p.15) 2 Regulatory Governance and the Challenge of Constitutionalism
Source:
The Regulatory State
Author(s):

Colin Scott (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593170.003.0002

This chapter assesses both the narrow and broad versions of the challenge presented to the values of constitutionalism by regulatory governance. The narrow constitutionalist critique locates the problem of regulatory governance with the delegation of governmental power to regulatory agencies. Such delegations may be quite extensive and arguably they undermine the effectiveness of the limitations placed on legislative and executive power. A broader constitutionalist critique looks beyond delegation to other organs of the state, and notes that the decentring of regulatory governance has increasingly implicated both non-state and supranational governmental bodies in regulatory tasks through implicit and explicit delegation and through the assumption of regulatory powers with little or no national governmental involvement. One response to the diffusion of regulatory power is to seek the extension of traditional modes of control and accountability beyond state actors to those who were found to wield power. Although this is not always inappropriate, as a comprehensive solution to the adaptation of constitutionalism to regulatory governance it is likely to be incomplete. The suggested alternative is to recognize diffusion not only in actors but also in modes of regulatory governance. Such a move recognizes a broader shift in constitutionalism from its liberal legal underpinnings to a version that emphasizes legal pluralism as a central characteristic of globalization.

Keywords:   constitutionalism, regulatory governance, governmental power, delegation, legal pluralism

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .