Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
W.B. Yeats, the Abbey Theatre, Censorship, and the Irish StateAdding the Half-pence to the Pence$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Lauren Arrington

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780199590575

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199590575.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 07 July 2020

‘I sing what was lost and dread what was won’: Yeats and the Legacy of Censorship, 1935–1939

‘I sing what was lost and dread what was won’: Yeats and the Legacy of Censorship, 1935–1939

Chapter:
(p.158) 6 ‘I sing what was lost and dread what was won’: Yeats and the Legacy of Censorship, 1935–1939
Source:
W.B. Yeats, the Abbey Theatre, Censorship, and the Irish State
Author(s):

Lauren Arrington

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199590575.003.0006

The relationship between censorship and financial circumstance culminates in this chapter. It argues that as Yeats aged and sought to secure his legacy he was complicit in censorship in the belief that the potential for long‐term financial security legitimized the compromise of artistic freedom. As the Abbey negotiated with the Irish government for a new building there was a drastic increase in the number of plays that were sent back for revision before their production; these revisions pertained to religious, sexual, and political references. A play by Paul Vincent Carroll, The White Steed, was deemed of excellent quality by Yeats, but because Carroll critiqued the hegemonic marriage of Catholic conservatism to the state Yeats believed that it would endanger the negotiations, and the play was refused. It argues that there is significant evidence to suggest that Yeats also withheld The Herne's Egg due to fears that it would inflame opposition to the reconstruction scheme. While Yeats hoped that immediate compromises would secure the theatre's financial future (and thus the freedom of the theatre to experiment). Negotiations for the new building came to an unsuccessful conclusion in 1939, the same year as Yeats's death, and the aesthetic compromise merely resulted in establishing a precedent for censoring plays as the theatre grew more conservative in the subsequent decades.

Keywords:   reconstruction, Paul Vincent Carroll, Herne's Egg, Yeats

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .