Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
From Bilateralism to Community InterestEssays in Honour of Bruno Simma$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Ulrich Fastenrath, Rudolf Geiger, Daniel-Erasmus Khan, Andreas Paulus, Sabine von Schorlemer, and Christoph Vedder

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199588817

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588817.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 22 November 2019

The Judge as Law-Maker: Thoughts on Bruno Simma's Declaration in the Kosovo Opinion

The Judge as Law-Maker: Thoughts on Bruno Simma's Declaration in the Kosovo Opinion

Chapter:
(p.809) The Judge as Law-Maker: Thoughts on Bruno Simma's Declaration in the Kosovo Opinion
Source:
From Bilateralism to Community Interest
Author(s):

Armin von Bogdandy

Marc Jacob

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588817.003.0051

Bruno Simma has always been a forceful advocate for the progressive development of international law, not least by international courts. Throughout many scholarly offerings, he has provided good arguments how lawyers can progressively develop international law without abandoning the enterprise of law altogether. He never made a secret of this modernizing thrust, openly criticizing both the positive law and the conservative attitude of certain institutions. A prominent example is his Declaration in the International Court of Justice's (ICJ) Kosovo Opinion, where he lambasts the Court's adherence to the Lotus principle for being ‘obsolete’ and calls for Advisory Opinions ‘with greater relevance as regards the international legal order’. One would in fact not be startled if his election to the bench of the ICJ occurred with an implicit mandate by the nominating and electing institutions to further his vision of international law through the Court's decisions. This chapter takes this approach as its starting point, but it discusses neither the individual elements of his progressive drive nor its overall vision. Rather, it seeks to provide some conceptual clarifications on the law-making function of the judge, and to examine differences between political and judicial modes of law-creation.

Keywords:   international law, law-making, judge, law-creation

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .