Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
From Bilateralism to Community InterestEssays in Honour of Bruno Simma$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Ulrich Fastenrath, Rudolf Geiger, Daniel-Erasmus Khan, Andreas Paulus, Sabine von Schorlemer, and Christoph Vedder

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199588817

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588817.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 13 November 2019

Universal International Law's Grammar

Universal International Law's Grammar

Chapter:
(p.138) Universal International Law's Grammar
Source:
From Bilateralism to Community Interest
Author(s):

Dirk Pulkowski

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588817.003.0011

As the universal geographical reach of the law of nations has become a reality, the universality of international law has come under attack in another respect. Theorists of international relations observe that the international order has become more and more ‘fragmented’ into a variety of issue-specific normative arrangements. In fact, some argue that ‘international law’ (in the singular) is gradually being replaced by a variety of issue-specific ‘international laws’ — including the legal rules of such regimes as trade law, environmental law, the law of human rights, and the law of cultural heritage. This radically particularistic vision of the international order is uncompelling. This chapter argues that while the substantive legal prescriptions under various regimes differ widely, all these regimes also have important commonalities. All subsystems of international law use a common discourse of justification, which permits and often requires decision-makers in different regimes to situate their decisions in relation to other regimes. The shared ground rules for rational discourse that universally apply across the international order notably include concepts of ‘general international law’ and accepted rules of interpretation. Hence, what holds the universe of international law together is not so much a hierarchy of norms or a common rule of recognition. Rather international regimes remain communicatively compatible with one another by virtue of a common discourse.

Keywords:   international law, law of nations, international relations, international order, trade law, environmental law, human rights

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .