Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Poor under Globalization in Asia, Latin America, and Africa$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Machiko Nissanke and Erik Thorbecke

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780199584758

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199584758.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 15 December 2019

Globalization, Growth, and Poverty in India

Globalization, Growth, and Poverty in India

Chapter:
(p.116) 5 Globalization, Growth, and Poverty in India
Source:
The Poor under Globalization in Asia, Latin America, and Africa
Author(s):

N. R. Bhanumurthy

Arup Mitra

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199584758.003.0005

In this chapter, an attempt is made to assess the impact of economic reforms on the incidence of poverty by decomposing the change in poverty ratio between two time‐points into growth/mean effect, inequality effect, and the population shift effect. Based on the National Sample Survey data an analysis has been carried out for two time‐periods: (i) 1983 to 1993–4 and (ii) 1993–4 to 1999–2000, broadly representing the pre‐reform and reform periods, respectively, for the rural and urban areas of the fifteen major states, and also for the all‐India level. The growth/mean effect, which determines the extent of fall (rise) in poverty incidence due to rise (fall) in mean per capita consumption expenditure, dominates in both the periods over the inequality effect, that estimates the rise (fall) in poverty due to rise (fall) in inequality. It also dominates over the population shift effect, which assesses the net impact on all‐areas combined poverty, of a decline (rise) in rural (urban) poverty caused possibly by rural–urban migration. The growth effect, which is beneficial for poverty reduction, seems to have gone up in the reform period. The adverse inequality effect also fell in magnitude in the second period compared with the first. States with a greater beneficial growth effect in the second period relative to the first also show a fall in the magnitude of an adverse population‐shift‐effect in the urban areas—i.e., a relatively smaller rise in the incidence of urban poverty caused by rural–urban migration.

Keywords:   decomposition, economic growth, globalization, India, inequality, population shift effect, poverty

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .