Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Happiness for Humans$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Daniel C. Russell

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780199583683

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2013

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199583683.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 05 April 2020

Socrates’ Case for the Sufficiency Thesis

Socrates’ Case for the Sufficiency Thesis

(p.135) 6 Socrates’ Case for the Sufficiency Thesis
Happiness for Humans

Daniel C. Russell

Oxford University Press

This chapter begins the examination of the Stoics’ thesis that virtuous activity is sufficient for happiness, starting with its origins in several of Plato’s Socratic dialogues. It argues that Socrates’ argument for the sufficiency of virtue for happiness is best understood as the Stoics understood it, viz. relying on a “formalized” conception of activity as the exercise of choice within circumstances from which the self is always distinct. Other interpretations of Socrates’ position are considered and rejected.

Keywords:   activity, apology, Cicero, On Goals, Epictetus, Euthydemus, Gorgias, Terence Irwin, Plato, Naomi Reshotko, George Rudebusch, self, Socrates, virtuous activity

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .