Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Insecurity StateVulnerable Autonomy and the Right to Security in the Criminal Law$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Peter Ramsay

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780199581061

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199581061.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 23 October 2019

The Right to Security and the ECHR

The Right to Security and the ECHR

Chapter:
(p.113) 6 The Right to Security and the ECHR
Source:
The Insecurity State
Author(s):

Peter Ramsay

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199581061.003.0007

This chapter demonstrates that the protection of the interest in subjective security by the substantive law of the Anti-Social Behaviour Order (ASBO) and by Section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 is for the most part consistent with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). It argues that while it is not formally a human right, the right to security is recognized as fundamental in the scheme of the ECHR. It explores the theoretical problem presented by the human rights of those individuals made subject to ASBOs. It distinguishes between two different senses of vulnerability — universal and particular — and accounts for the apparent denial of human rights to the particularly vulnerable through a critique of Bryan Turner's vulnerability theory of human rights. This theory is shown to give no definitive answer to the imposition of liabilities for failure to reassure such as those found in the ASBO, and to offer no theoretical resources to resist them.

Keywords:   European Convention on Human Rights, Human Rights Act, rights and responsibilities, vulnerability, vulneration, DPP v Hammond, Norwood v DPP, Norwood v United Kingdom

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .