Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Law and AnthropologyCurrent Legal Issues Volume 12$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Michael Freeman and David Napier

Print publication date: 2009

Print ISBN-13: 9780199580910

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: February 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580910.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 20 October 2019

Indigenous Peoples and the Right of Political Autonomy in an Age of Global Legal Pluralism

Indigenous Peoples and the Right of Political Autonomy in an Age of Global Legal Pluralism

Chapter:
(p.351) 14 Indigenous Peoples and the Right of Political Autonomy in an Age of Global Legal Pluralism
Source:
Law and Anthropology
Author(s):

Steven Wheatley

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580910.003.0014

This chapter focuses on the complexities that emerge in the system of global governance following the acceptance that indigenous peoples are ‘peoples’ with a right to self-government through (indigenous) law. The chapter proceeds as follows. It first provides an overview of the adoption of the UN Declaration and its status in international law, before examining the provisions on shared government and self-government. The Declaration reflects a condition of legal pluralism, and the chapter examines the meaning of the idea before considering its relevance beyond the state. It concludes on the need for a distinction to be made between normative pluralism and legal pluralism, and in doing so, develops a concept of law that applies to state law, international law, and the laws of indigenous peoples. The chapter then returns to the question of the conflict of law norms in conditions of global legal pluralism, complexity, uncertainty, and reasonable disagreement. It argues that legal orders should approach the question of the conflicts of laws from the perspective of democratic legitimacy. It questions whether it is appropriate to apply this ‘meta-perspective’ to the position of indigenous peoples, and concludes with a number of observations on the right of political participation for persons belonging to indigenous peoples in the fragmented system of global governance.

Keywords:   global governance, indigenous peoples, Indigenous Peoples, law norms, legal pluralism

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .