Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Taking Morality SeriouslyA Defense of Robust Realism$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

David Enoch

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199579969

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579969.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 19 January 2020

The Argument from the Moral Implications of Objectivity (or Lack Thereof )

The Argument from the Moral Implications of Objectivity (or Lack Thereof )

Chapter:
(p.16) 2 The Argument from the Moral Implications of Objectivity (or Lack Thereof )
Source:
Taking Morality Seriously
Author(s):

David Enoch

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579969.003.0002

This chapter presents a partly normative argument for metaethical objectivity, arguing that non-objectivist metaethical views (including expressivist ones) have highly implausible normative implications in cases of interpersonal disagreement and conflict. The chapter first present and defends a normative principle (‘Impartiality’) governing the resolution of certain interpersonal conflicts, and then proceeds to argue that this principle — together with a host of intuitively non-objectivist metaethical theories — entails unacceptable normative results. An appendix discusses the issue of metaethics' normative neutrality, suggests an interpretation of it (according to which metaethics is morally neutral if it conservatively extends morality), and argues that the argument in the main text shows that at least with neutrality thus understood, metaethics is not normatively neutral.

Keywords:   objectivity, morality, disagreement, conflict, neutrality, conservative extension, Impartiality, subjectivism, expressivism, response-dependence

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .