Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Regulating Health and Environmental Risks under WTO LawA Critical Analysis of the SPS Agreement$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Lukasz Gruszczynski

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780199578924

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199578924.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 12 November 2019

Risk Management Disciplines and the SPS Agreement

Risk Management Disciplines and the SPS Agreement

Chapter:
(p.219) 6 Risk Management Disciplines and the SPS Agreement
Source:
Regulating Health and Environmental Risks under WTO Law
Author(s):

Lukasz Gruszczynski

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199578924.003.0007

This chapter concentrates on the risk management dimension of the SPS Agreement. It submits that the concept of risk management may be legitimately used in the context of the SPS Agreement, while its recognition helps to reconcile the WTO's obligations with international and domestic practice in the SPS field. The second part addresses the specific SPS requirements that are relevant to risk management actions. This includes disciplines pertaining to the determination of an appropriate level of protection, options evaluation, implementation and maintenance of SPS measures, and their monitoring and review. The chapter notes the moderate success of case law in elucidating the normative content of relevant provisions and identifies those developments that appear unsatisfactory (e.g. the proportionality requirement). Special attention is also given to the problem of risk perception as a possible justification for divergences in domestic risk regulations. In this context, the chapter argues that the role of Article 5.5 is limited to detection of discrimination rather than imposing any technocratic rationality.

Keywords:   ALOP, level of protection, consistency, equivalence, GATT, necessity, non-discrimination, proportionality, regionalization, risk management

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .