Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Regulating Health and Environmental Risks under WTO LawA Critical Analysis of the SPS Agreement$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Lukasz Gruszczynski

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780199578924

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199578924.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 17 June 2019

Science, Risk Assessment, and the SPS Agreement

Science, Risk Assessment, and the SPS Agreement

Chapter:
(p.107) 4 Science, Risk Assessment, and the SPS Agreement
Source:
Regulating Health and Environmental Risks under WTO Law
Author(s):

Lukasz Gruszczynski

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199578924.003.0005

This chapter addresses the science-based provisions of the SPS Agreement. The main part of the discussion is dedicated to risk assessment disciplines as elaborated by the SPS case law. This includes the problem of the required structure and the content of risk assessment, the role of scientific minority opinions as a legitimate basis for a SPS measure, and standard of review applicable to evaluation of scientifically complex issues. Against this analysis, the last part of the chapter attempts to identify the ultimate function that is performed by science under the SPS Agreement and to propose some critical observations on its capacity to perform such a role. It concludes that although science-based criteria may compromise the choice of WTO members regarding an acceptable level of risk, a proper interpretation of the SPS Agreement may reduce that danger, maintaining at the same time advantages of the current system.

Keywords:   good veterinary practice, hormones, junk science, minority scientific opinion, proportionality, risk assessment, science and law, scientific evidence, SPS Agreement, standard of review

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .