Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Pierre-Marie Dupuy, Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, and Francesco Francioni

Print publication date: 2009

Print ISBN-13: 9780199578184

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: February 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199578184.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 13 November 2019

Transnational Investment Arbitration: From Delegation to Constitutionalization?

Transnational Investment Arbitration: From Delegation to Constitutionalization?

Chapter:
(p.118) 7 Transnational Investment Arbitration: From Delegation to Constitutionalization?
Source:
Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration
Author(s):

Alec Stone Sweet (Contributor Webpage)

Florian Grisel

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199578184.003.0007

This chapter compares different ‘Principal-Agent’ (P-A) models of arbitration and adjudication, and then applies them as a means of focusing empirical attention on how investor-State arbitration is, in fact, evolving. There is a familiar traditional distinction between, on the one side, state-centred conceptions of international judges as agents of states with mandates limited by public international law; and, on the other side, private law conceptions of commercial arbitrators settling private disputes on the basis of private contracts. The chapter argues that the arbitral world is being gradually transformed through a process of ‘judicialization’, which blurs the traditional distinctions and raises important constitutional issues. It illustrates the argument with reference to the increasing recourse to judicial precedents, balancing the review of the ‘proportionality’ of State restrictions on investors' rights, and to the increasing calls for appellate review of the decisions of investor-state arbitral tribunals.

Keywords:   Principal-Agent models, P-A models, investor-State arbitration, private contracts, judicialization, judicial precedents, investors' rights

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .