Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Judicial DeliberationsA Comparative Analysis of Transparency and Legitimacy$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Mitchel de S.-O.-l'E. Lasser

Print publication date: 2009

Print ISBN-13: 9780199575169

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199575169.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 26 May 2020

Similarity and Difference

Similarity and Difference

Chapter:
(p.145) 5 Similarity and Difference
Source:
Judicial Deliberations
Author(s):

Mitchel de S.-O.-l’E. Lasser

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199575169.003.0005

This chapter looks at the underlying similarities and differences in judicial argumentation between the Cour de cassation of France, the United States Supreme Court, and the European Court of Justice (ECJ). What characterises the French and ECJ judicial systems is not their formalism, but their respective bifurcation into two relatively distinct discursive spheres. For both courts, the official judicial decisions constitute magisterial discursive spheres in which the courts write collegially and offer relatively deductive forms of argument and reasoning. For both courts, conversely, the Report of the Reporting Judges and the Conclusions/Opinions of the Advocates General constitute relatively unceremonious discursive spheres in which the judicial magistrates write individually and offer relatively non-deductive and purposive forms of argument and reasoning. This chapter also looks at traditional American accounts of French civil law and American common law difference.

Keywords:   judicial argumentation, Cour de cassation, France, United States, Supreme Court, European Court of Justice, judicial decisions, magistrates, civil law, common law

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .