Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Competition Policy in the EUFifty Years on from the Treaty of Rome$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Xavier Vives

Print publication date: 2009

Print ISBN-13: 9780199566358

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2009

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199566358.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 18 October 2019

Article 81 EC Revisited: Deciphering European Commission Antitrust Goals and Rules

Article 81 EC Revisited: Deciphering European Commission Antitrust Goals and Rules

Chapter:
(p.43) 3 Article 81 EC Revisited: Deciphering European Commission Antitrust Goals and Rules
Source:
Competition Policy in the EU
Author(s):

Matthew Bennett

A. Jorge Padilla

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199566358.003.0003

This chapter provides a brief overview of Article 81 EC and considers the implications of two recent Court of First Instance (CFI) judgments (Glaxo and O2 (Germany)) for the understanding of (i) the ultimate goal of Article 81; and (ii) the nature and structure of the test to be applied by European competition authorities and courts in the assessment of horizontal and vertical agreements. It discusses the implications of those judgments for the ongoing debate in connection with the reform of Article 82 EC. While the current debate on Article 82 is characterized by the confrontation between those that defend an ordo-liberal approach to antitrust enforcement (based on ambiguous concepts such as ‘competition on the merits’, ‘normal competition’, ‘objective justification’, or ‘special responsibility’) and those who defend an unstructured rule of reason, disregarding that ‘administrability’ and ‘legal certainty’ are key desirable characteristics in competition law, the recent Article 81 case law provides an intermediate and more pragmatic approach to the competitive assessment of business practices. A structured approach that, while accepting the need to balance the pro-competitive and anticompetitive effects of those practices, recognizes the difficulty and the transaction and error costs associated with such complex balancing exercises.

Keywords:   agreements, Article 81, Article 82, EC law, balancing rules, competition law, Rule of Reason

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .