Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Historical Syntax and Linguistic Theory$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Paola Crisma and Giuseppe Longobardi

Print publication date: 2009

Print ISBN-13: 9780199560547

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2009

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199560547.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 07 December 2019

Change, relatedness, and inertia in historical syntax

Change, relatedness, and inertia in historical syntax

Chapter:
(p.1) 1 Change, relatedness, and inertia in historical syntax
Source:
Historical Syntax and Linguistic Theory
Author(s):

Crisma Paola

Giuseppe Longobardi (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199560547.003.0001

This chapter discusses the conceptual and methodological shortcomings arising from the notion of ‘change’ within the abstract biolinguistic framework of generative grammar. The chapter argues that founding historical linguistics on the notion of change is hardly compatible with focus on I-language (Chomsky 1986), but it is preferable to ground historical linguistics in the concept of non‐accidental and non‐universal similarity among I‐languages.

Keywords:   relatedness, change, inertia, I‐language, E‐language

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .