Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Debates on the Measurement of Global Poverty$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Sudhir Anand, Paul Segal, and Joseph E. Stiglitz

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780199558032

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199558032.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 08 December 2019

Irrelevance of the $1‐a‐Day Poverty Line 1

Irrelevance of the $1‐a‐Day Poverty Line 1

Chapter:
(p.143) 5 Irrelevance of the $1‐a‐Day Poverty Line1
Source:
Debates on the Measurement of Global Poverty
Author(s):

T. N. Srinivasan

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199558032.003.0007

This chapter argues that whether an individual is deemed poor depends not only on that individual's economic and non-economic endowments but also, equally, the place of that individual in the socio-economic-political processes of the country of which he or she is a citizen. For this reason any meaningful indicator that distinguishes the poor from non-poor has to be multidimensional. Any indicator of poverty could serve three distinct purposes: (i) a positive one of depicting the extent of poverty, the socio-economic profile of the poor, at one or more points of a time, in some well defined unit (e.g., nation state or units within a nation, or aggregates of nations such as low income countries), with the depiction providing a yardstick both for monitoring the performance in poverty reduction of national governments and international agencies and also for an analysis of determinants of poverty; (ii) a normative one as an input into policy formulation; and (iii) for mobilization of support among citizens, media, and governments for the objective of and policies for poverty alleviation and for policies. However, given the formidable problems in conceptualizing and measuring poverty and the tremendous heterogeneity among the poor — however conceptualized — within and across societies, any uni-dimensional indicator such as the $1 a day poverty line popularized by the World Bank is meaningless and completely irrelevant. At best one can hope to construct a comprehensive multidimensional poverty indicator for relatively homogeneous groups recognizing the unavoidable arbitrariness in doing so. Some tentative ideas for such an indicator are provided.

Keywords:   poor, non-poor, poverty measurement, poverty indicators, multi-dimensional poverty measures

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .