Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Debates on the Measurement of Global Poverty$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Sudhir Anand, Paul Segal, and Joseph E. Stiglitz

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780199558032

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199558032.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 25 January 2020

The Debate on Globalization, Poverty, and Inequality: Why Measurement Matters 1

The Debate on Globalization, Poverty, and Inequality: Why Measurement Matters 1

Chapter:
(p.25) 2 The Debate on Globalization, Poverty, and Inequality: Why Measurement Matters1
Source:
Debates on the Measurement of Global Poverty
Author(s):

Martin Ravallion

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199558032.003.0002

Markedly different claims have been heard within the development community about how much progress is being made against poverty and inequality in the current period of globalization. This chapter provides a nontechnical overview of the conceptual and methodological issues underlying these conflicting claims. It argues that the dramatically differing positions taken in this debate often stem from differences in the concepts and definitions used, and differences in data sources and measurement assumptions. These differences are often hidden from view in the debate, but they need to be considered carefully if one is to properly interpret the evidence. The best available evidence suggests that if the rate of progress against absolute poverty in the developing world in the 1990s is maintained, then the Millennium Development Goal of halving the 1990 aggregate poverty rate by 2015 will be achieved on time in the aggregate, though not in all regions. The chapter concludes with some observations on the implications for the more policy-oriented debates on globalization and pro-poor growth.

Keywords:   global poverty, inequality, Millennium Development Goals, data sources, pro-poor growth

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .