Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Networks and Knowledge in Roget's Thesaurus$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Werner Hüllen

Print publication date: 2009

Print ISBN-13: 9780199553235

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2009

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199553235.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 17 July 2019

A Cognitive View of Synonymy

A Cognitive View of Synonymy

Chapter:
(p.144) 10 A Cognitive View of Synonymy
Source:
Networks and Knowledge in Roget's Thesaurus
Author(s):

Werner Hüllen

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199553235.003.0010

The chapter provides a concept of synonymy which all my historical and book-orientated research has as its basis. Synonymy is not merely an anomaly in the semiotic system because it disregards the elementary rule that the difference of form creates the meaning; synonymy is a basic phenomenon of lexis because words can only be semanticized by words, which means that every word in a language has its synonyms. Besides, the rules of textual constitution demand that there be perfect synonyms to avoid repetition. However, the meaning of words is not what we find in dictionary definitions. On the level of the system, so-called synonyms are still different from each other. But in performance and within given bounds, which are delimited by the lexemes, the meanings of words adapt certain senses following the constraints of co-texts and contexts. This is a highly economic principle which avoids creating new lexemes for every shade of meaning. In performed language—not in the system created out of reflection—words can therefore also adopt perfect synonymy. These ideas are explained in greater detail and with illustrative examples. They follow the lines given by cognitive linguists (e.g. Pustejowsky, Greenberg).

Keywords:   cognitive framework, human mind, malleability, mental representation, linguistic competence, icon, homonymy, construal

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .