Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
An Analysis of the Economic Torts$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Hazel Carty

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780199546749

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199546749.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 18 July 2019

Preliminary Discussion of the General Economic Torts

Preliminary Discussion of the General Economic Torts

Chapter:
(p.17) 2 Preliminary Discussion of the General Economic Torts
Source:
An Analysis of the Economic Torts
Author(s):

Hazel Carty

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199546749.003.0002

The recent House of Lords' decisions in OBG v Allan and Total Network SL v Revenue and Customs Commissioners, reveal the conflict of policy within the highest court and are subjected to a preliminary discussion in this chapter. In Allen v Flood, the House of Lords adopted the abstentionist agenda for the general economic torts: even where intentional and unjustified economic harm was inflicted, liability would only follow where unlawful means where used. And a two-tort analysis of economic tort liability was offered, based on the indirect infliction of economic harm in a three-party setting. Subsequently these torts got into an incoherent mess but in OBG the House of Lords appeared to herald a return to a narrow application as envisaged in Allen. Unfortunately, within eighteen months the House of Lords in Total Network appeared to shift these torts from the abstentionist to interventionist track, resulting in further mess.

Keywords:   OBG v Allan, Total Network SL v Revenue, abstentionist agenda, interventionist agenda, three-party setting

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .