Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
One Political Economy, One Competitive Strategy?Comparing Pharmaceutical Firms in Germany, Italy, and the UK$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Andrea M. Herrmann

Print publication date: 2008

Print ISBN-13: 9780199543434

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2009

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199543434.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 28 January 2020

Linking Antitrust Legislation, Standards, and Competitive Strategies

Linking Antitrust Legislation, Standards, and Competitive Strategies

Chapter:
(p.83) 4 Linking Antitrust Legislation, Standards, and Competitive Strategies
Source:
One Political Economy, One Competitive Strategy?
Author(s):

Andrea M. Herrmann (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199543434.003.0004

This chapter examines how firms can compete despite comparative disadvantages of national antitrust legislation. It first studies whether pharmaceutical firms in Germany, Italy, and the UK develop different types of component standards to pursue strategies of radical product innovation, incremental product innovation, and product imitation, respectively. Since quantitative analyses of interviews with Quality Assurance managers show that firms differ in their standardization approaches according to the strategies they pursue, the chapter also looks at how national antitrust legislation affects these strategies. Contrary to the findings in the previous chapter, qualitative analyses of interviews suggest that national antitrust legislation constitutes neither a comparative institutional advantage nor a disadvantage. The chapter concludes with reflections on how these findings contribute to the resource-based view and the competitiveness literature, and on reasons why a Schumpeterian perception of firms as creative entrepreneurs may nevertheless help to explain how firms gain competitive advantages.

Keywords:   component standards, innovation strategies, comparative advantages, resource-based view, competitiveness theories, Schumpeter

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .