Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Why Not Torture Terrorists?Moral, Practical, and Legal Aspects of the "Ticking Bomb" Justification for Torture$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Yuval Ginbar

Print publication date: 2008

Print ISBN-13: 9780199540914

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2009

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199540914.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 22 September 2019

The ‘Defence of Necessity’ as Legal Grounds for Torture

The ‘Defence of Necessity’ as Legal Grounds for Torture

Chapter:
(p.304) 19 The ‘Defence of Necessity’ as Legal Grounds for Torture
Source:
Why Not Torture Terrorists?
Author(s):

Yuval Ginbar

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199540914.003.0019

This chapter analyzes national and international legal materials to consider the viability of the ‘defence of necessity’ (DoN) as legal grounds for torturing in a ticking bomb situation. As the chapter explains, in order to provide such grounds the DoN would have to be shown as constituting, at least potentially, an uncapped ‘choice of evils’ justificatory defence. While there is a narrow theoretical scope for interpreting the DoN in England and the USA as having these characteristics, German and other legal systems ‘cap’ it, placing absolute restraints on ‘lesser evil’ calculations. Exempting torturing interrogators from criminal liability using the DoN violates states' international legal obligations to prevent and punish torture. In international criminal law, including the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, the ‘defence of necessity’ is conflated with that of duress, and its availability is closely linked to the unavailability of justifications for acts such as torture.

Keywords:   torture, legal aspects, international law, human rights law, international humanitarian law, defence of necessity, USA, UK, Germany, criminal law

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .