Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
EmpathyPhilosophical and Psychological Perspectives$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Amy Coplan and Peter Goldie

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199539956

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199539956.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 23 May 2019



Interpersonal vs Artistic?

(p.185) 12 Empathy:

Graham McFee

Oxford University Press

The paper considers the use of the concept empathy in philosophical aesthetics, and in art appreciation, though “objects of comparison” (PI §130) from inter-personal empathy. It focuses first on the explanation of failure of empathy in terms of a failure to match the psychological state of the objects of (attempted) empathy: this notion is problematic, applied to others, as we cannot readily determine whether there is such a match; nor does it make sense to quantify such ‘matching’ as this or that percentage. Further, empirical work which seems to elaborate the concepts here still depends centrally on this ‘matching’ model. Moreover, the differences between ‘matching’ a real person and doing this for a fictional character mean that, however successful it might be in respect of empathy viewed inter-personally, it will never be informative in the same way for characters in literature. To see why, we must both deploy ‘objects of comparison’ from the inter-personal cases, noting especially the differences in contexts and resources for ‘matching’, and also insist on contrasting judgement and appreciation of artworks (artistic judgement) with the judgements we make of (other?) aesthetic objects. For then we will not confuse fiction with literature.

Keywords:   matching, literature, fiction, Pérez-Reverte, Wittgenstein, object of comparison

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .