Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Contradiction in Disability LawSelective Abortions and Rights$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Smitha Nizar

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9780199466658

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2016

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199466658.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 22 October 2019

Disability-selective Abortions in National and International Law

Disability-selective Abortions in National and International Law

Chapter:
(p.142) Chapter Six Disability-selective Abortions in National and International Law
Source:
The Contradiction in Disability Law
Author(s):

Smitha Nizar

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199466658.003.0006

The justifiability or legality of disability-selective abortion law has been assessed in this chapter. Persons with disabilities were not the lone group of people targeted to select out. A similar situation had sustained against women in India. The technological advancements such as prenatal diagnostic tests have caused to further the long persisting social prejudice against girl children in India. Until law intervened, such practices were unproblematic in our society. However, while intervening with such prejudice, the legislature has permitted to sustain it against disability. The contradictory legal position towards disability brings however, the legal discrimination against persons with disabilities. In contrast to the legal nuances of UNCRPD, treating disability as an abnormality and preventing births of infants with disabilities discriminates against persons with disabilities. Consequently, both PNDT Act and MTP Act, the national law on abortion, violate the international law UNCRPD.

Keywords:   PNDT Act, MTP Act, UNCRPD, legality, contradiction of law, female infanticide, foeticide, social opprobrium, ratification of UNCRPD, State responsibility

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .