Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2013, Volume I$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Giuliana Ziccardi Capaldo

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780199388660

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: April 2015

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199388660.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 25 January 2020

Comment and Analysis

Comment and Analysis

Competing “Principles of Justice” in Multilevel Commercial, Trade and Investment Adjudication: Need for More “Judicial Dialogues” and Legal “Cross-Fertilization”

Chapter:
(p.163) Comment and Analysis
Source:
The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2013, Volume I
Author(s):

Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199388660.003.0009

This chapter maintains that courts in the dispute settlement system of the WTO continue to neglect their legal duties (I). The diverse conceptions of multilevel “judicial governance” are due to competing principles in transnational law and adjudication (II). International law limits principles of “Westphalian justice” by protecting cosmopolitan rights and “constitutional justice” (III–IV). GATT 1947 focused on limiting judicial accountability of trade politicians (V). Only after the GATT Office of Legal Affairs was established and the Uruguay Round negotiations launched could the GATT legal system be transformed into the integrated WTO legal and dispute settlement system. Multilevel judicial cooperation among commercial, trade and investment adjudication should help limit the power-oriented claims of trade diplomats; the requirements of legal systems call for “judicial comity” among courts in the WTO legal and dispute settlement system (VI). Judicial “cross-fertilization” can help clarify “principles of justice” and protect WTO guarantees of non-discrimination and rule of law (VII).

Keywords:   arbitration, consistent interpretation, comity, commercial law, courts, GATT, investment law, justice, trade law, WTO

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .