Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Beyond the Arab SpringThe Evolving Ruling Bargain in the Middle East$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Mehran Kamrava

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780199384419

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: December 2014

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199384419.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 13 December 2019

Revolution And Constitution In The Arab World, 2011–12

Revolution And Constitution In The Arab World, 2011–12

Chapter:
(p.151) 6 Revolution And Constitution In The Arab World, 2011–12
Source:
Beyond the Arab Spring
Author(s):

SaAmir Arjomand

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199384419.003.0007

Considering constitutions as the formalization of political reconstruction and the establishment of new ruling bargains for regimes following revolutions, this chapter traces the evolution of the new ruling bargains in Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya. It compares the patterns of constitutional politics in these countries, focusing on the struggle for the new political order among competing social and political groups and institutions, the outcome of which will entrench emerging ruling bargains by making new constitutions. The comparisons are centered on four sets of variations. The first and second types of variation are in the traditions of the rule of law, and in the character of the old states and the power structures that sustained them, considered as key determinants of the parameters of constitutional change. The third is variation in the extent of negotiated change versus that forced by revolutionary violence. The last source of variation concerns the constitutional placement of Islam. With the passing of the age of ideology in the Middle East, Islam has been proposed by the Arab Islamist parties as a limitation on the legislative power of the “civic state”, in contrast to the Iranian counter-constitutionalist premise.

Keywords:   Tunisia, Islam, Egypt, civic state, Libya, constitutions, Islamist parties

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .