Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Climate Change and SocietySociological Perspectives$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Riley E. Dunlap and Robert J. Brulle

Print publication date: 2015

Print ISBN-13: 9780199356102

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: August 2015

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199356102.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 16 September 2019

The Climate Change Divide in Social Theory

The Climate Change Divide in Social Theory

Chapter:
(p.333) 11 The Climate Change Divide in Social Theory
Source:
Climate Change and Society
Author(s):

Robert J. Antonio

Brett Clark

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199356102.003.0011

Major epistemic and substantive splits characterize social theories of climate change. The “realism–constructivism” debate raised questions about humanity’s embeddedness in the biosphere, relative autonomy from natural limits, and cultural construction capacities; sparked disagreements over climate science certainty and state-driven versus market-oriented strategies; and spurred exchanges regarding democracy and climate policy. Theorists have closed the gap, stressing the importance of both social construction and obdurate biophysical conditions. However, remaining differences condition the sharpest divide among social theorists over the normative priority and prudence of capitalism’s growth imperative and veracity of its sustainability. Disagreements persist regarding the urgency and scale of climate change mitigation and adaptation, and the need to reduce economic growth and transform policy regimes that drive it. These divides generate productive tensions and conversation as long as the dynamic biophysical realities of climate change remain in sight.

Keywords:   natural limits, realism, constructivism, growth imperative, state-driven, market-driven, postexemptionalist

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .