Conversation without Mobilization
Chapter 5 examines why, in spite of constant political arguments on IGN.com’s posting boards and the fact that people in the space form long-lasting relationships, the space has not produced any real political mobilization. The lack of anonymity on IGN.com means that people form smaller groups within the larger group. Large-group cohesion is further weakened by an extremely accessible board format that allows for private conversation among users and minimizes a need for a strict lexicon or a knowledge of community history to indicate belonging among users. These factors, tied to a high level of regulation of speech and behavior on IGN.com, undermine collective group mobilization. However, there is some indication that the conversations on IGN.com do influence user beliefs.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.