Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Women in PhilosophyWhat Needs to Change?$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Katrina Hutchison and Fiona Jenkins

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780199325603

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2014

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199325603.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 25 January 2020

Sages and Cranks

Sages and Cranks

The Difficulty of Identifying First-Rate Philosophers

(p.103) 5 Sages and Cranks
Women in Philosophy

Katrina Hutchison

Oxford University Press

Why are women underrepresented in philosophy? Meditating on Quine’s comment that the “separation of philosophers into sages and cranks seems to be more sensitive to frames of reference [than in other disciplines]” this paper explores the possibility that part of the explanation might be the way that philosophers establish their credibility. The argument draws on philosophical work on the nature of expertise, as well as Miranda Fricker’s work on epistemic injustice.

Keywords:   Women in philosophy, Credibility, Feminist epistemology, Expertise, Authority, Philosophical pedagogy, Philosophical methods

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .