Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Principles of the Law of Restitution$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Graham Virgo

Print publication date: 2006

Print ISBN-13: 9780199298501

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199298501.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 22 January 2020

The Principle of Unjust Enrichment

The Principle of Unjust Enrichment

Chapter:
(p.51) 3 The Principle of Unjust Enrichment
Source:
The Principles of the Law of Restitution
Author(s):

Graham Virgo

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199298501.003.0003

Although the unjust enrichment principle often operates positively, in the sense that the claimant must establish that the defendant has been unjustly enriched before restitution is available, sometimes the principle may operate negatively. This is because restitutionary relief may be awarded to prevent the defendant from becoming unjustly enriched. Even though the unjust enrichment principle has been clearly recognised at the highest level, the place of that principle within the law of obligations and the function of the principle still require careful justification. A number of commentators have suggested that restitutionary liability should be based on some other theoretical foundation, including proprietary theory, no unifying principle of unjust enrichment, and unconscientious retention. Possible functions of the unjust enrichment principle are discussed, namely, the formulaic function and the normative function. The approach adopted by England with respect to the function of the unjust enrichment principle is also considered.

Keywords:   unjust enrichment, restitution, proprietary theory, unconscientious retention, formulaic function, normative function, England, law of obligations

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .