This chapter focuses on diachronic phenomenal unity. How can we make sense of the flux and flow that we find in experience, and which make the ‘stream’ metaphor so apt? It is argued that to account for the diachronic unity of consciousness we need appeal to nothing more than co-consciousness, albeit in its diachronic form. According to the ‘overlap model’, which is elaborated and defended here, a stream of consciousness consists of a succession of specious presents which share common parts, and specious presents are unified by diachronic co-consciousness. This result is important: the unity of consciousness has been accounted for without appealing to the self, and on the plausible assumption that experiences occurring in unified states and streams of consciousness have a common subject, we have a non-question begging criterion for assigning experiences to subjects.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.