Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Punishing Persistent OffendersExploring Community and Offender Perspectives$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Julian V. Roberts

Print publication date: 2008

Print ISBN-13: 9780199283897

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: March 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199283897.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 14 July 2020

The Intuitive Sentencer: Public Attitudes to Prior Offending

The Intuitive Sentencer: Public Attitudes to Prior Offending

(p.163) 8 The Intuitive Sentencer: Public Attitudes to Prior Offending
Punishing Persistent Offenders

Roberts Julian V

Oxford University Press

Where does the intuitive sentencer stand with respect to the use of previous convictions at sentencing? At first glance the answer would seem straightforward. A survey of the general public in the United Kingdom on whether they would support a ‘three strikes and You're out’ scheme, whereby offenders automatically receive a prison sentence if they are convicted of any three crimes, revealed that four-fifths of the polled public endorsed this tough recidivist sentencing proposal. These results suggest that public support for cumulative sentencing is overwhelming — and for an offender convicted for only the third time. In reality, community reaction to the punishment of repeat offenders is more nuanced. This chapter explores the nature of public opinion with regards to the sentencing of repeat offenders. First, it discusses related research in the field of public attitudes to the recidivist sentencing premium. This is followed by a description of findings from original research drawing upon a survey of the public in the United Kingdom.

Keywords:   United Kingdom, recidivist sentencing premium, repeat offenders, public opinion, intuitive sentencer, previous convictions, cumulative sentencing

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .