Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Syntax of AspectDeriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Nomi Erteschik-Shir and Tova Rapoport

Print publication date: 2005

Print ISBN-13: 9780199280445

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280445.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 25 February 2020

Change-of-State Verbs: Implications for Theories of Argument Projection

Change-of-State Verbs: Implications for Theories of Argument Projection

Chapter:
(p.274) 13 Change-of-State Verbs: Implications for Theories of Argument Projection
Source:
The Syntax of Aspect
Author(s):

MALKA RAPPAPORT HOVAV

BETH LEVIN

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280445.003.0013

Verbs showing multiple argument projection options, often with concomitant shifts in aspectual classification or assignment of the ‘aspectual’ roles measure or incremental theme, are ubiquitous. Their pervasiveness has given rise to two hypotheses concerning argument realization: argument expression is not lexically determined and only aspectual notions determine argument expression. This chapter argues against both hypotheses through an examination of change of state verbs. It shows that the argument expression possibilities of these verbs are determined by a nonaspectual, lexicalized property – change of state – and cannot be handled by purely aspectual nonlexical theories of argument projection. Therefore, the meaning that is lexicalized in a verb determines its grammatical and interpretive properties to a large degree, contrary to the hypothesis that argument expression is not lexically determined. Furthermore, these lexical properties do not correspond to well-known aspectual notions, contrary to the hypothesis that only aspectual notions are relevant to argument expression.

Keywords:   aspectual classes, telicity, change of state, verb, incremental theme, direct object

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .