The obscure vocabulary which used to do the work of unjust enrichment is still constantly in use. Again and again we encounter the action for money had and received, the action for money paid, quasi-contract, constructive trust, and so on. This chapter deals with terms which have directly competed with unjust enrichment in the naming and organization of this area of the law or, more accurately, an area of law approximating to or including this one. The line between competing generics and persistent fragments cannot be cleanly drawn. As competing generics from the past, this chapter considers quasi-contracts and implied or constructive contracts. It then turns to modern competition, under which head it deals with restitution and with variations on unjust enrichment itself. Of these, restitution sticks out as making no pretence of being an event-oriented term, but it is undoubtedly a competitor.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.