Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Paradigms in Phonological Theory$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Laura J. Downing, T. Alan Hall, and Renate Raffelsiefen

Print publication date: 2004

Print ISBN-13: 9780199267712

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: February 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199267712.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 21 July 2019

Uniformity and Contrast in the Hungarian Verbal Paradigm

Uniformity and Contrast in the Hungarian Verbal Paradigm

Chapter:
(p.263) 10 Uniformity and Contrast in the Hungarian Verbal Paradigm
Source:
Paradigms in Phonological Theory
Author(s):

Péter Rebrus

Miklós Törkenczy

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199267712.003.0010

This chapter analyzes lexical allomorphy in the Hungarian verbal paradigm, specifically the variety that is paradigmatically motivated. The traditional strategy to account for allomorphy with reference to a common underlying form cannot succeed in the case of lexical allomorphy because in lexical allomorphy the allomorphs do not have phonological properties that permit the postulation of a single underlying source. Therefore lexical allomorphy is inaccessible to derivational analysis or an analysis based on the comparison of underlying and surface forms. By contrast, the current analysis relies on Output–Output constraints. It shows that lexical allomorphy is due to an interaction of paradigmatic uniformity and contrast constraints which are relativized to morphosyntactic dimensions. Hungarian verbal inflectional morphology is basically agglutinative, but crucially the correspondence between morphosyntactic values and distinct suffixes is not always one-to-one: in some forms more than one morphosyntactic category can be expressed by one suffix. The chapter develops an alternative interpretation of PAR constraints to handle this situation. This interpretation explains an interesting phenomenon (of which the Hungarian paradigm is an example), namely the case when lexical allomorphy is conservative, i.e., when the lexical allomorph must be one which is attested at some other point(s) in the paradigm.

Keywords:   paradigm uniformity, Hungarian verbal paradigm, definiteness neutralization, anti-harmony, lexical allomorphy

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .