Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Rethinking the Reasonable PersonAn Egalitarian Reconstruction of the Objective Standard$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Mayo Moran

Print publication date: 2003

Print ISBN-13: 9780199247820

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199247820.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 12 November 2019

Living on the Fault Line: The Reasonable Person and the Developmentally Disabled

Living on the Fault Line: The Reasonable Person and the Developmentally Disabled

Chapter:
(p.18) 1 Living on the Fault Line: The Reasonable Person and the Developmentally Disabled
Source:
Rethinking the Reasonable Person
Author(s):

Mayo Moran

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199247820.003.0002

As the common law's tool for identifying behaviour that attracts neither censure nor legal liability, the reasonable person plays a central role in the law of negligence. Only those who emulate the reasonable person will be considered without fault and hence relieved of the consequences of their actions. In this sense, the behaviour of the reasonable person defines the content of the renowned objective standard of the law of negligence: a standard that, though it does not demand perfection, insists upon a certain level of prudence or attentiveness to the interests of others. This chapter examines the reasonable person and his relationship with the problem of the cognitively or developmentally disabled, thus uncovering deep tensions and ambiguities in the law of negligence. Five arguments used to justify the treatment of the developmentally disabled under the reasonable person standard are discussed: the unmanageability argument, deterrence rationale, compensation rationale, luck and responsibility, and equality rationale.

Keywords:   fault, consequences, developmentally disabled, standard, law of negligence, liability, unmanageability, deterrence, compensation, equality

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .