Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
EC Membership and the Judicialization of British Politics$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Danny Nicol

Print publication date: 2001

Print ISBN-13: 9780199247790

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: March 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199247790.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 20 November 2019

The Human Rights Comparison

The Human Rights Comparison

Chapter:
(p.228) 8 The Human Rights Comparison
Source:
EC Membership and the Judicialization of British Politics
Author(s):

Danny Nicol

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199247790.003.0008

This chapter is another ‘comparison’ chapter analysing the history of parliamentary debates on a Bill of Rights, culminating in the passage of the Human Rights Act 1998. It investigates whether the issues of parliamentary sovereignty and judicial power were clearer to MPs in the Bill of Rights context than in the Community context, and considers why this might have been the case.

Keywords:   parliamentary debates, Bill of Rights, Human Rights Act, parliamentary sovereignty, judicial power

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .