Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Complementarity in the Rome Statute and National Criminal Jurisdictions$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Jann K. Kleffner

Print publication date: 2008

Print ISBN-13: 9780199238453

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2009

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199238453.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 18 January 2020

The Context and Emergence of Complementarity

The Context and Emergence of Complementarity

Chapter:
(p.57) III The Context and Emergence of Complementarity
Source:
Complementarity in the Rome Statute and National Criminal Jurisdictions
Author(s):

Jann K. Kleffner

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199238453.003.0003

This chapter places complementarity into the broader context of allocating the respective competences of international and domestic courts and tribunals. It traces the emergence of complementarity in the negotiations leading up to the adoption of the Rome Statute. This drafting history reveals that the relationship between the ICC and national criminal jurisdictions was a recurring phenomenon of fundamental importance. Agreement was reached at an early stage on the generic idea that national suppression should be the first line of defence in the fight against impunity, while the Court should fill the gaps left by ineffective national criminal jurisdictions. Yet the details of regulating complementarity proved contentious. States regarded complementarity as the core avenue to reconcile their concerns about their sovereignty with the establishment of an international criminal court. The detailed rules on complementarity thus assumed a vital role in making the Statute as widely acceptable to States as possible.

Keywords:   international courts, domestic courts, models of allocation, Nuremberg, complementarity, negotiations, Rome Statute, ICC

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .