Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Pleasure, Mind, and SoulSelected Papers in Ancient Philosophy$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

C. C. W. Taylor

Print publication date: 2008

Print ISBN-13: 9780199226399

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2008

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226399.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 14 October 2019

Wisdom and Courage in the Protagoras and the Nicomachean Ethics

Wisdom and Courage in the Protagoras and the Nicomachean Ethics

(p.281) 16 Wisdom and Courage in the Protagoras and the Nicomachean Ethics
Pleasure, Mind, and Soul

C. C. W. Taylor

Oxford University Press

This chapter compares accounts of the relation of wisdom to courage given in the Protagoras and the Nicomachean Ethics. In the former, Socrates maintains that courage is identical with knowledge (= wisdom) of what is best for the agent, that fear is simply the belief that an envisaged outcome will be bad for the agent, and hence, since no-one intentionally does what they believe will be bad for them, that it is impossible for anyone intentionally to do what he or she fears. For Aristotle fear is not a belief, but an emotion which is naturally caused by envisaged harm. That emotion can, and typically does, coexist with the belief that the right thing to do is to face what is fearful, and courage consists, not in absence of fear, but in responding appropriately to fear (and also to tharros, boldness). Hence, Aristotle can allow that it is possible to do what one fears, and that doing so in the right way is characteristic of the courageous person. This has the paradoxical consequence that courageous action must be to some extent unpleasant, and involve some degree of motivational conflict, which is apparently at odds with Aristotle's general view that the virtuous person takes pleasure in acting virtuously, and is unconflicted in so acting. It is argued that this paradox is resolved, not by insisting that the courageous person must be totally without motivational conflict, but by recognizing that he or she, though to some degree conflicted, nevertheless exerts the necessary effort gladly and without hesitation.

Keywords:   tharros, boldness, fear, harm, virtue of character, pathos, emotion, pleasure, distress, conflict of motivation

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .