Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Torts and Rights$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Robert Stevens

Print publication date: 2007

Print ISBN-13: 9780199211609

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2009

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199211609.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 28 January 2020

Policy

Policy

Chapter:
(p.306) 14 Policy
Source:
Torts and Rights
Author(s):

Robert Stevens

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199211609.003.0014

The range of reasons which a judge can employ in adjudicating a case is restricted. Judges lack the political jurisdiction and technical competence to employ all of the possible rational reasons which could be employed. Viewing the law of torts as reflecting the rights we have one against another explains how judges were and are able to make and develop the common law. Justiciability explains the court's incrementalist approach to change in the law.

Keywords:   policy, principle, adjudication, justiciability, incrementalism

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .