Monroe C. Beardsley holds that literary interpretations can be assessed for truth and that conflicting interpretations cannot both be true. By contrast, Joseph Margolis argues for the compatibility of conflicting interpretations by denying they can be assessed for truth. Both assume that if any interpretation of a work can be true, then only one interpretation of it can be true. That assumption is rejected here. This chapter is interested in discovering the meanings that can be put upon a work and argues that it can be true that many meanings are sustained by it.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.