Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
International Economic Law and GovernanceEssays in Honour of Mitsuo Matsushita$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Julien Chaisse and Tsai-yu Lin

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9780198778257

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2017

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198778257.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 19 February 2020

Balancing Investment Protection and Other Public Policy Goals

Balancing Investment Protection and Other Public Policy Goals

Lessons from WTO Jurisprudence

Chapter:
(p.68) 7 Balancing Investment Protection and Other Public Policy Goals
Source:
International Economic Law and Governance
Author(s):

Yasuhei Taniguchi

Tomoko Ishikawa

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198778257.003.0007

With the dramatic growth of foreign investment laws in the past few decades, there is an increasing concern over investment arbitration, including that it has reduced the scope for state regulation. This is contrasted with the WTO Appellate Body, which has received wide support and trust as an efficient and legitimate state–state dispute settlement forum. With this background, this article examines the reasons behind the difference in these systems of law and proposes that, despite various differences between the WTO dispute settlement system and investment arbitration, there are certain contexts where WTO jurisprudence may provide helpful guidance with investment arbitration in addressing the issue of balance between investment protection and public interests. As one such ‘context’, this article focuses on the approach of the WTO Appellate Body in the application of general exception clauses and its implications on the interpretation of investment protection obligations by investment arbitration tribunals.

Keywords:   GATT Article XX, investment arbitration, public policy goals and protection of investment/trade, treaty interpretation, WTO jurisprudence

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .