Multiple grammars, dominance, and optimization
Multiple grammars, dominance, and optimization
This chapter examines parasitic gaps in varieties of German spoken by bilingual heritage speakers in Wisconsin, using Optimality Theory (OT) to model variation. Data from interviews with forty-one consultants show that our consultants license parasitic gapping in syntactic domains that are otherwise prohibited in Modern Standard German. We argue that these structures in spoken Wisconsin Heritage German result from online transfer from the socially dominant L2 (English) into the heritage L1 (German). We sketch a model of this transfer as a case of constraint reranking, and suggest that variation in the dataset benefits from the use of “floating” constraints (e.g. Antilla 1997; Legendre et al. 2002; Nagy and Reynolds 1997). We conclude with remarks on the role of bilingualism in language change, and argue that an OT approach is by nature suited to analyzing just such variation and change in bilingual heritage grammars.
Keywords: Optimality Theory, heritage languages, bilingualism, German, English, floating constraints, optimization
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .
