Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Reinventing PunishmentA Comparative History of Criminology and Penology in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Michele Pifferi

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9780198743217

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: August 2016

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198743217.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 15 December 2019

Nulla Poena Sine Lege and Sentencing Discretion

Nulla Poena Sine Lege and Sentencing Discretion

Chapter:
(p.178) 8 Nulla Poena Sine Lege and Sentencing Discretion
Source:
Reinventing Punishment
Author(s):

Michele Pifferi

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198743217.003.0008

The chapter describes how criminological proposals and penal reformism affected the constitutional balance of the European Rechtsstaat: European legal culture rejected administrative discretion in sentencing and argued for the need of judicial sentencing decision, even though individualization and preventive justice changed some procedural rules. It examines how continental reformers (such as Bruno Franchi, Eugenio Florian, André Henry, Ugo Conti), rather than following the US separation of verdict and sentencing, suggested individualizing the entire criminal trial from its very beginning, to allow the judge to collect any possible evidence on the character of the accused. The chapter also analyses the different positions at the London International Prison Congress 1925: the European delegates were in favour of judicial individualization; the US delegates advocated administrative individualization.

Keywords:   Rechtsstaat, individualized criminal trial, judicial individualization, administrative individualization, Bruno Franchi, Eugenio Florian, Ugo Conti, André, Henry, administrative discretion, constitutional penal safeguards

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .