Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Interpretation of International Law by Domestic CourtsUniformity, Diversity, Convergence$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Helmut Philipp Aust and Georg Nolte

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9780198738923

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: March 2016

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198738923.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 14 November 2019

Judicial Dialogue as a Means of Interpretation

Judicial Dialogue as a Means of Interpretation

Chapter:
(p.72) 5 Judicial Dialogue as a Means of Interpretation
Source:
The Interpretation of International Law by Domestic Courts
Author(s):

Antonios Tzanakopoulos

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198738923.003.0005

This chapter discusses whether judicial dialogue on international law between domestic courts may be conceptualized as a new means of interpretation—beyond the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. After defining ‘dialogue’ and presenting its various potential iterations, the chapter argues that in fact judicial dialogue between domestic courts is required under international law, including the Vienna Convention. This is because domestic court decisions on international law may constitute subsequent practice which is to be taken into consideration when interpreting a treaty, in accordance with Article 31(3)(b) VCLT. But domestic court decisions may also constitute practice and/or reflect opinio juris, which domestic courts must find in order to determine the existence and content of customary international law. As such, domestic courts must engage with the relevant decisions on international law by domestic courts in other jurisdictions. They must engage in judicial dialogue as a means for interpreting international law.

Keywords:   judicial dialogue, subsequent practice, interpretation, VCLT, Article 31, Article 32, treaties, customary international law

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .