Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Parliaments and the European Court of Human Rights$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Philip Leach and Alice Donald

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9780198734246

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2016

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198734246.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 19 July 2019

Human Rights, Democracy, and Legitimacy in the Convention System

Human Rights, Democracy, and Legitimacy in the Convention System

Chapter:
(p.113) 4 Human Rights, Democracy, and Legitimacy in the Convention System
Source:
Parliaments and the European Court of Human Rights
Author(s):

Alice Donald

Philip Leach

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198734246.003.0004

This chapter explores the relationship between human rights, democratic governance, and legitimate authority within the Convention system. It examines the distinction—and inter-relationship—between normative, legal, and social concepts of legitimacy. Further, it discusses the extent to which the Convention system is democratically legitimate, including the (potentially) legitimacy enhancing role of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. It argues that parliaments have strong reasons to defer to the interpretive authority of the European Court of Human Rights and respect its adjudicatory authority, since such engagement enhances their own legitimacy. It discusses how the Court might incentivize parliamentary engagement in the implementation of its judgments and Convention standards, by making assessment of the quality of parliamentary processes a systematic feature of its adjudications, in keeping with the principle of subsidiarity. The chapter considers—and rejects—arguments for ‘democratic override’ of judgments to which a majority of parliamentarians is opposed.

Keywords:   parliament, ECHR, Convention, court, human rights, legitimacy, democracy, Parliamentary Assembly, Council of Europe, subsidiarity

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .