Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
A Continental Distinction in the Common LawA Historical and Comparative Perspective on English Public Law$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

J.W.F. Allison

Print publication date: 2000

Print ISBN-13: 9780198298656

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298656.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 22 February 2020

A Categorical Approach to Law

A Categorical Approach to Law

Chapter:
(p.109) 6 A Categorical Approach to Law
Source:
A Continental Distinction in the Common Law
Author(s):

J. W. F. Allison

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298656.003.0006

To clarify another contextual feature affecting the working of a distinction between public and private law, this chapter elaborates on the novel concept of a categorical approach characterized by its treatment of law as a systematic and exhaustive body of rules. It attributes the insignificance of the Roman and medieval distinctions to the lack of such an approach. It describes its evolution in France — inter alia, through humanist systematization, periods of codification, and the influence of the French Exegetical School — and its culmination in the categorical distinction between public and private law in the Blanco case. The chapter contrasts the traditional remedial, pragmatic, and unsystematic English approach manifest in resistance to codification and the gradual secretion of public law principles in the procedural interstices of various prerogative and ordinary remedies. It attributes the systematic problems in applying the procedural distinction in O'Reilly v Mackman — mainly the confused assortment of distinguishing criteria and the indeterminacy of exceptions to judicial review's exclusivity in public law — to the continuing lack of a categorical approach in the attempt to systematize procedures.

Keywords:   system, medieval, codification, humanist, Exegetical School, Blanco, pragmatic, principles, O'Reilly v Mackman, distinguishing criteria

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .