Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
A Continental Distinction in the Common LawA Historical and Comparative Perspective on English Public Law$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

J.W.F. Allison

Print publication date: 2000

Print ISBN-13: 9780198298656

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298656.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 17 November 2019

Conclusions and Implications for English Law

Conclusions and Implications for English Law

Chapter:
(p.235) 11 Conclusions and Implications for English Law
Source:
A Continental Distinction in the Common Law
Author(s):

J. W. F. Allison

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298656.003.0011

The provisional conclusions reached through application of this book's method to the English and French contexts invite supplementary and corrective research of other contexts. Central to those conclusions is a systemic relationship between a working distinction between public and private law and features of its legal and political context, expressed in the book's model or ideal type and elaborated upon in its chapters. This chapter explains implications of that relationship for English law — the hazards of the distinction's ill-considered transplantation and the need to retreat from the distinction and/or comprehensive reforms to accommodate it. It describes a partial retreat and considers comprehensive reforms, ranging from practical proposals by Lord Woolf and theoretical elaboration upon concepts of the state, monopoly, and power. It suggests that greater European legal and political integration or convergence through the use, inter alia, of proportionality or the ECJ's distinction between the vertical and horizontal effect of directives, facilitate the distinction's accommodation, but that its influence is uneven and thus insufficient to bring it about. A satisfactory separate system of English public law, it concludes, is still remote.

Keywords:   ideal type, public and private, transplantation, Woolf, state, monopoly, European integration, convergence, proportionality, vertical and horizontal effect

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .