Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Moral GapKantian Ethics, Human Limits, and God's Assistance$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

John E. Hare

Print publication date: 1997

Print ISBN-13: 9780198269571

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: October 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198269571.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 31 March 2020

Substitutes for God’s Assistance

Substitutes for God’s Assistance

(p.170) 7 Substitutes for God’s Assistance
The Moral Gap


Oxford University Press

This chapter examines attempts in naturalistic ethics to bridge the moral gap. These include the works of Donald Campbell, David Gauthier, and Allan Gibbard. These authors suggested bridging the moral gap through a scientific mediational normative ethics, in which both the moral gap is recognized and some non-theological substitute for God’s assistance is introduced to close it. In these cases what closes the moral gap is some machinery external to the agent’s will, which transforms egotists into useful members of society.

Keywords:   moral gap, naturalistic ethics, Donald Campbell, David Gauthier, Allan Gibbard, normative ethics, God

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .