Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Cross CurrentsFamily Law and Policy in the US and England$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Sanford N. Katz, John Eekelaar, and Mavis MacLean

Print publication date: 2000

Print ISBN-13: 9780198268208

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: March 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198268208.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 19 May 2019

English Family Law since World War II: From Status to Chaos

English Family Law since World War II: From Status to Chaos

Chapter:
(p.122) (p.123) 6 English Family Law since World War II: From Status to Chaos
Source:
Cross Currents
Author(s):

John Dewar

Stephen Parker

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198268208.003.0006

This chapter explores developments in legal ideology and policy in family law in England and Wales since World War II. It does so by identifying three ideological and policy ‘eras’, or schemas, in family law: the ‘formal’, the ‘functionalist’, and the ‘complex’ (or, less politely, the ‘chaotic’). Each era can be understood as characterised by a different set of balances struck between four dichotomies: rights-utility, form-substance, principle-pragmatism, and public-private. The formal era refers to the period from 1857 (the introduction of civil divorce) to the introduction of the divorce reforms in the late 1960s. Some forms of cohabitation were seen as functional equivalents to marriage and a process began of according to them similar legal consequences. The functional model gave centre stage to marriage as a means of linking law to families. In defining obligations of family members towards each other, the law now pays less attention to marriage and more to parenthood. The chaotic complex was marked by strong tensions between rights and utility, rules and discretions, and autonomy and coercion.

Keywords:   England, Wales, family law, divorce, marriage, cohabitation, parenthood, rights, utility, autonomy

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .